ObjectiveTo assess the impact of resilience, the ability to withstand and bounce back from adversity, on measures of well-being, self-reported stress, and mental health diagnoses.MethodsThis study was a cross-sectional survey of participants seen at an executive health practice at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, from January 2012 through September 2016.Participants completed an anonymous survey that included demographic information and 3 validated survey instruments-the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the 12-item Linear Analogue Self-Assessment Scale (LASA), and the 14-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS).
Self-reported history of mental health diagnoses was also collected.CD-RISC scores were used to stratify participants into lower (ResultsOf the 2,027 eligible participants, 1,954 Metal Wallet Card met the study inclusion criteria as currently employed corporate-sponsored executive or business professionals (self-designated) who completed the CD-RISC survey.Most participants (62.
5%) were aged 40 to 59 years.The majority were male (78.3%), white (95.
3%), educated (86.2%), and in a committed relationship (89.7%).
Among participants, 41.7% reported higher resilience, 34.3% had medium resilience, and 24.
0% had lower resilience.The quality of life and overall LASA scores were positively associated with higher resilience (P ConclusionsIn Bike Parts - Bearings this cross-sectional survey of a large cohort of corporative executives, the lower-resilience cohort had a 4-fold higher prevalence of depression and an almost 3-fold higher prevalence of anxiety compared with the higher-resilience cohort.High resilience was positively associated with well-being and negatively associated with perceived stress.
Our findings suggest that higher resilience in the executive workplace environment is associated with better mental health, reduced stress, and greater well-being.